The first casino I deposited at showed an Interac logo on its cashier page. What actually happened was a redirect to a processor I had never heard of, a second account to create, and a withdrawal that arrived weeks later as a cheque. Nothing about it was hidden, exactly — it was all documented somewhere — but none of it was what the logo had led me to expect.
This site is one person testing what cashiers actually do rather than what they advertise. There is no editorial team and no contributor roster, and I would rather say so than assemble a fake masthead.
Every operator listed gets a real account, identity verification completed before funding, and a deposit of my own money by Interac e-Transfer where the cashier supports it. I record what the deposit flow actually does — a genuine transfer to an email address, or a handoff to iDebit, InstaDebit or another processor — because those are different products sharing one logo.
Then the terms, before any play: the wagering multiple, whether it applies to the bonus alone or to deposit plus bonus, the maximum bet permitted while a bonus is live, and any cap on withdrawals. Finally a withdrawal, and a note of what came back and whether the cashier asked for documents it had not asked for at signup.
No withdrawal times in hours, because that figure depends on your bank and your verification state as much as on the operator. No ratings out of ten, because a score dresses an opinion as a measurement. No licence numbers I have not personally checked against the issuing regulator's own register — a footer badge is an image, not a verification.
The site is funded by affiliate commission, which pays for the accounts and the hours spent on them. It does not buy ranking position, and the clearest evidence is the fourth review on the homepage, where I recommend declining the welcome bonus of a brand that pays us.